PAR-131
Investigate ticket regarding Walgreens transactions
User reported an issue with buying/selling to the Walgreens company. When attempting these transactions, the system indicates that the transactions are linked to a player named kydradabeast, who hasn't been online in over 2 years. Screenshot attached for reference.

Comments
tesks · Jun 11, 2026, 11:21 AM
Triage: Walgreens stale-owner hypothesis — NOT reproducible in current prod data
Data finding (firm "Walgreens"):
firmrow:firm_id=902,display_name=Walgreens,is_archived=0,default_account_id=103403, proprietor74C29469-907B-48B5-9E3F-F3CF44514CB4= Trentrick_Lamar.firm_accountsfor 902: single account 103403 (BUSINESS, "Walgreens Corporate Account",removed_at=NULL). Itsowner_uuid_bin=74C29469-…= Trentrick_Lamar — i.e. owner already equals the current proprietor.- Access on 103403:
account_members= {Trentrick_Lamar, left_at NULL};account_authorizers= {Trentrick_Lamar, revoked_at NULL}. Proprietor is already member + authorizer. firm_employeefor 902: only Trentrick_Lamar (role 4506, not left).firm_transfer_requestsfor 902: 0 rows — no recorded handover.
About "kydradabeast":
firm_playershas KydraDaBeast =EF9A429C-C524-454A-B2A7-347E68AC657B— a completely different UUID from the account owner (74C29469-…).- KydraDaBeast owns only her own
PERSONALaccount (id 1168). She owns no Walgreens/business account and has no member/authorizer/employee row on account 103403 or firm 902.
Remediation-set check: account 103403 is not in the PAR-141 remediated set {103518,105539,105545,105548,108944} (Costco/UMStone/UMTree/UMNet/Deliveroo), yet it still shows the correct (non-stale) owner. Current global drift is 0, consistent with this.
Conclusion
This is not the PAR-141 stale-owner bug in current data. The Walgreens Treasury account owner already points at the current proprietor (Trentrick_Lamar), KydraDaBeast has zero relationship to firm 902, and there is no owner/proprietor drift to fix. No remediation SQL is warranted — reassigning owner here would be a no-op (owner already == proprietor).
The reporter's screenshot is dated 2026-06-05 and shows "kydradabeast". Since the DB is now clean, the most likely explanations are:
- The drift was already remediated / self-healed before this triage (the firm changed hands away from KydraDaBeast, account owner was corrected), or
- A ChestShop sign cached the old owner name on physical signs — ChestShop legacy
b:<FirmName>→B:<accountId>self-heals lazily on next interaction; signs touched before the fix may still render the stale name until re-interacted.
Recommended next step (needs reporter / in-game confirmation)
- Ask the reporter to re-test a buy/sell at the Walgreens shop now and report the counterparty name shown — if it now reads "Trentrick_Lamar", the issue is resolved and this can be closed.
- If it still shows "kydradabeast" in-game, capture the exact shop-sign owner line / account reference (e.g.
b:vsB:<id>) — that points to a stale ChestShop sign rather than a Treasury account-owner problem, and would need a sign re-touch / ChestShop legacy-migration check, not anowner_uuid_binreassignment.
No DB write performed. Classification: duplicate-or-fixed (covered by / consistent with PAR-141; current data shows no stale-owner drift for Walgreens).
Activity
- paradaux description: Description updated
- paradaux changed status to Status → Canceled
- tesks commented
- tesks created the issue